Sunday, February 25, 2007

Greatness of Desika Darsanam

GREATNESS OF SWAMI DESIKA DARSANAM -
Excerpts from the article of Abhinavadesikar Uttamur Swami-
Courtesy: "Seva Malar" 1957. Translation: Anbil Ramaswamy
=======================================================================================================================================Sriya:
Pathi Sarveswaran found that His message rendered for the
benefit of humanity, in His incarnations as Sri VarAha and Sri RAma
did not get well publicized. So, He reiterated the same more
elaborately in His incarnation as Sri KrishNa under the pretext of
advising Arjuna, explaining clearly the difficulties involved in other
means like Karma, JnAna and BhaktiyOgas and rounding it up with a
grand finale that Prapatti which he had earlier instructed was THE
BEST means for humanity to reach Him. To reinforce this message, He
appeared as ThiruvEnkaTamudaiyAn.

Despite the message being so loud and clear, people were found
ignorant of the full import thereof. So, He deputed Srimad NAthamuni,
Srimad YAmuna muni and Sri RamAnuja muni to expound the content of the
SAstras through SribhAshya, GitAbhAshya etc. as also the means to
practice (anushTAnam) Prapatti through "SaraNAgathi Gadhyam". During
the days of UDaiyavar, the message did sink deep into the minds of
people as seen in the affirmation-
"SrI RamAnuja DivyAjnA prathivAsaram ujjwalA, dighantha vyApinee
bhooyAth sA hi lOka hithaishiNee". Therefore, the doctrine came to be
known as "Sri RAmAnuja Darsanam".

But, due to the mushrooming of votaries of heretic religions
frantically trying to spread their faith, due to our Scriptures lying
scattered in different works without being uniformly codified and also
due to the loss of the works of Sri NAthamuni hailed as the crest
jewel of SAstras (Grantha rathnam), ordinary folk were misled by the
spurious arguments of charlatans.

Feeling that if this were allowed to corrupt people anymore, the whole
world would come to a naught, "Thirumalai ThiruvEnkaTamuDaiyAn"
Himself, out of infinite compassion came down as "Thooppul
ThiruvEnkaTamuDaiyAn". For over 100 years, as Thoopul Desika, He
revealed in Himself the aspects of IlayaperumAL of RAmAvatara,
BalarAma of KrishNAvatAra, and "Apara Hayagriva"- all in one.

He spent his whole life in giving kAlakshEpams in SriBhAshya,
GitAbhAshya, proving the hollowness of the arguments of opponents in
lively debates, creating works on our Darsanam for the benefit of
posterity, writing commentaries on Bhagavad RAmanuja's BhAshyams,
erecting impregnable fortresses to protect our SiddhAntam from alien
creeds through works like "NyAya Parisuddhi", "NyAya SiddhAnjanam,
"SarvArtha Siddhi", "Tattva mukthA kalApam" etc as well as refutation
of other faiths through "Satha dhooshaNi" etc.

The old PrathivAdhi Bhayankaram ANNan of those times selected just two
of Swami Desika's works and was all praise for them- viz. "SarvArtha
Siddhi" and "SathadhooshaNi."

In "NyAya Parisuddhi", Swami Desika has blessed us with 49 Sutras.
This one work itself is enough for everyone belonging to Desika
SampradAyam to name it as "Desika Darsanam" and publicize the same as
a bounden duty because the gems hidden in these Sutras will be
appreciated only by a close study. The same applies to his
"Paramathabhangham" and his "protective" works (Rakshai) where
Prapatti has been expounded with extraordinary clarity like "NikshEpa
Rakshai", "Srimad Rahasya Traya SARam", "NyAsa Vimsathi" and other
collects known as "Chillarai RahasyangaL"

Inspite of all these, if our Darsanam does not percolate among the
masses, it is not because of lack of works but because of lack of
interest among both the Scholars whose duty is to propagate the tenets
and the layfolk who need to be taught. When such treasure is readily
available for us, we see people squandering their time, wealth and
energy in useless pursuits. It remains to be seen whether, at least
now, in the face of potential danger of aggression by other creeds
that are trying to rear their ugly heads, we awaken to the need to
prove ourselves as true Desika Bhaktas.

Since, our Darsanam was established by ThiruvEnkaTamuDaiyAn Himself,
it would be appropriate to call it "Sri Desika Darsanam" or "Sri
VenkaTEsa Darsanam". If we look at it dispassionately, shedding
narrow-mindedness, the conclusion is inescapable that this IS "Swami
Desika Darsanam" ONLY.

Since it is said that Swami Desika SriSukti is "OUR" Darsanam -
"NAthOpagjnam pravriththam bahubhi: upachitham yAmunEya prabandhai:
samyak ThrAtham yatheendrai: idam Akhila thama: karsanam Darsanam
na;", it is only proper to call "OUR" Darsanam as "SwAmi Desika
Darsanam"

5 comments:

Unknown said...

~Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha~
~Srimath Varavaramunaye Namaha~

This article is nothing but an obsession aimed to justify calling vadakalai sampradayam as the 'sole' inheritors of Desikan's works.

Nobody denies the fact that Sri NigamAntha MahAguru, who was the amsam of ThiruvenkatAdrInathan, is one of the greatest acharyas of sri vaishnavism.

But one should remember, the darshanam is always 'Ramanuja Darshanam'. It is not 'Nampillai Darshanam', 'Ammal Darshanam', 'Engal Azhwan Darshanam', 'Mamunigal Darshanam' OR 'Desika Darshanam'.

Sri Ramanuja established the sampradayam on a firm footing. Later acharyas like Sri Desikan nourished and nurtured that sampradayam. We can say, if it wasn't for Sarvatantra Svantantarar, the sampradayam would be 'kadal osai', but we should NEVER say that it is no longer 'Ramanuja Sampradayam'.

This Anbil Ramaswamy knows nothing about Desikan's works even. All those stories about Desikan competing in poetry contests, fighting with other acharyas are pure imaginations, conceived 200 years ago. If 'Vadakalai' is the sole 'desika sampradayam', kindly tell me, why has no Vadakalai commented on Desikan's works earlier than 200 years ago?

The commentaries on Desikan's works, prior to 1800 include:

1) ChandamArutham (commentary on Sata Dushani) by Sri Doddacharya.

2) Commentary on 'Nyaya Parisuddhi' by Narasimharajacharya, sishya of Doddacharya.

3) 'Yatindra Mata Deepika' by Srinivasacharya, a sishya of Doddacharya, is based on Vedantacharya's works.

4) Commentary on 'Nyaya Siddhanjanam' by Rangaramanuja Muni. This swami was a thennacharya and not a 'vadakalai'. Read his commentary on Nyaya Siddhanjanam's 'Jiva Pariccheda', where he calls Lakshmi a Jivatma. Incidentally, this also shows Desikan regarded Piratti in the same manner as Sri Lokacharya did.

Furthermore, Sri Rangaramanuja Muni's comments on antarvyApti differs from Vadakalai position. It is in tune with the thennacharya position.

It is very clear that prior to 1750, Vadakalai sampradayam had nothing to do with Ramanuja Darshanam. Even their affinity to Desikan is new. Even the earliest commentary to Rahasya Traya Saram is post-1800.

The real stamp of finality is in Arasanapalli Venkatadhvari Kavi's Viswagunadarshana Champu. He was a vadakalai vidwan belonging to the late 18th century. In the above work, he mentions clearly that the Brahmins in Sriperumbudur were not following Vedic traditions because they gave more importance to Divya Prabandhams (which he regards as not meant for 'brahimins').

Clearly shows that the vadakalai sampradayam had nothing to do with divya prabandham OR our Kavi TArkika Simham prior to 1800.

Truth is bitter. But unfortunately, if such articles are posted, it must out. Nobody states that mordern vadakalais are not Ramanuja Sampradaya followers. Any true Desika Bhakta is certainly a Ramanuja Dasan and a Sri Vaishnava. The current Azhagiya Singar, Parakala Swamy and Andavan Swamy are certainly mahatmas.

But, devotion must be in the proper way, not a distortion of facts.

Adiyen Sri Vaishnava Dasan,

Narayanan.

இனியன் பாலாஜி said...

now only i heard about him . for the past one month i searched about his works. i am very happy . atlast i found you. i want to know about him more. and also i want to know about his works. do you know tamil? where can i get all his works.when you come chennai i want to meet you.
balai-astrologer
91500 10995

Srivathsa said...

How do you prove that krishna is paripurna in vishistaadvaita?.....
because krishna only said that he is paripurna in bhagavath geetha...

but ,according to vishistaadvaita...we are brahman,at the same time ,we are not paripurna...similar case applies to krishna...so,how is krishna paripurna in vishistaadvaita?

gundugolanu said...

Sri Krishna preaching including bhagavatGita and commentary of Sri Bhagavatpada make one to conclude he is soul path and destination to all

sathiyam100 said...

Excellent response. Great insight